Home
waltboyes [userpic]

Invensys and Emerson: Dueling User Groups

October 2nd, 2005 (06:30 pm)

This week, since I haven't yet acquired the ability to clone myself, I've sent Rich Merritt to cover the Emerson Exchange, meeting in Orlando, while I cover the Invensys User Conference, meeting in Houston.

I wonder how many actual users had to make the same choice I did. Quite a few, I'll bet, since there are many process plants with both Invensys (Foxboro, Triconex, Avantis, Sim-Sci Esscor) and Emerson products and systems.

From a customer friendliness point of view, this attack scheduling is bad for the industry.

Oh, well. Merritt will be sending me dispatches from the Emerson front to post, and I will be blogging live from the George Brown Center in Houston, recently home to a number of Hurricane Katrina and Rita displaced persons.

Comments

Posted by: ((Anonymous))
Posted at: October 3rd, 2005 01:45 pm (UTC)
They did it on purpose

I think they scheduled their meetings in the same week, on purpose.
This proves that some companies are misusing user groups for their own benefit.
The purpose of a users group meeting is to bring together users, so can meet each other, share experiences, ... And not to enter into a competition of "I have more attendees than you have"
I have been active in the organizing committee of another supplier. One of the most important issues each year is selecting a date :in order to avoid as much as possible clashes with other conferences, users group meetings. It is a also a sign of respect for the other suppliers.

Posted by: ((Anonymous))
Posted at: October 25th, 2005 03:28 pm (UTC)
Re: They did it on purpose

Firstly let me declare that I am affliated with Emerson (work for one of their Local Business Partners). The date for the meetings are published a year ahead (check out the Emerson Exchange webpage). I don't know that who selected which date first but I am sceptical of this conspiracy theory that "we" did it on purpose - if anybody, I would lay the "blame" on the other users meeting (but I would, won't I ...)

2 Read Comments