Home
waltboyes [userpic]

What's FDT good for???

October 17th, 2005 (11:35 am)

From Larry O'Brien at ARC:

Apparently something.
Hey Walt --
How's your FDT research going? I read Dick Caro's article. Speaking as someone who has gone through the meat grinder on this topic from both sides, there are some interesting resources out there I can point you to. One is a book published by Vogel and Praxis that was handed out at the last Hanover fair that outlines some end user applications for FDT that are pretty impressive. One user from DSM pretty succinctly describes the root problems between EDDL and FDT (which are not, in my opinion, competing technologies). If you get in touch with Scott Bump of Invensys (who is their FDT person), perhaps he can send you a copy or you can order one online here:
http://www.elektronikpraxis.de/publikation/ep_publikation_en_19145.html
There is one particularly good case study from BASF, which is where, incidentally, FDT got its start back in the mid-90s in Ludwigshafen I think. It was originally specified by BASF so they could have a single interface to devices across multiple networks! I think this is the original plant included in an ABB case study here (see copyright 2002, I think the project actually started in 1998).
http://library.abb.com/GLOBAL/SCOT/scot267.nsf/VerityDisplay/42BE96A1FDB17CB385256F35006B4399/$File/BASF_Polymer.pdf


So, what do you all think? Is this controversy manufactured?

Walt

Comments

Posted by: ((Anonymous))
Posted at: October 18th, 2005 01:23 pm (UTC)
More new members for FDT

Phoenix, AZ—Honeywell has joined the Field Device Tool (FDT) Group, a collaboration of international automation companies that supports advancement of FDT and Device Tool Management (DTM) technology.

Honeywell expects to use the open technology of DTM to improve support for its own and other suppliers' devices. Expanding device connectivity and integration with Honeywell's Experion Process Knowledge System is intended to help users reduce maintenance costs and improve process uptime with the company's asset-management and automation offerings.


"Honeywell is investing in technology and open standards that provide the market with a wide range of choices when interconnecting devices and subsystems with automation solutions," said Paul Butler, Honeywell Process Solutions vice president of technology.

He noted that joining the FDT Group reflects the company's support for technologies based on open-systems standards that benefit the end-user community, adding that Honeywell "remains firmly committed to its investments in DDL technology for HART and FOUNDATION Fieldbus. FDT technology is complementary to DDL technology and holds promise in other areas, specifically around the support of configuration and diagnostics for more sophisticated subsystems, especially in the discrete and hybrid industries. The new FDT Group organizational structure makes it much easier for companies to collaborate on this open technology," Butler said.

Also Schneider, Shell, & Saudi Aramco have formally joined up.

Posted by: waltboyes ([info]waltboyes)
Posted at: October 18th, 2005 02:56 pm (UTC)
Re: More new members for FDT

Dear Honeywell: If you are going to post a press release on my blog, please identify yourself as the poster...it is only fair. If you notice, when I post releases, I identify them as such, and state their provenance.

To the meat of your post: It isn't clear from what Paul is quoted as saying that FDT is or is not a "competing" technology with EDDL. Emerson says it is, and Dick Caro agrees. Other people aren't so sure.

But what it seems to me is shaping up here is the same sort of infighting between vendors that made Foundation Fieldbus ten years late.

That isn't good for the industry or the end users. It is not even good for the vendors in an environment where end users are demanding open systems.

Walt

2 Read Comments